If you haven’t seen the new trailer for ‘TRON Legacy‘ you can check it out here. I’ve embedded the full HD version from YouTube. It looks absolutely fantastic. I loved the original TRON and this continuation looks to have all the markings of a terrific film. I love how they did a sequel and resisted doing a remake. Remakes are bad. This looks epic!
I found this little gem via Filmmaker Magazine. If you’re like me, you’re psyched about the new Canon Rebel 550 T2i coming out in a couple of weeks. It’s about $800 bucks and has a sensor that rivals the wonderful RED One. True the RED is a superior camera in many different ways, but the T2i is $800! Shooting with a DSLR has it’s issues, but if you can work around them, you can have spectacular results as evidenced in this video by Nino Leitner.
You can also check out his blog here for a full review of the camera.
Will I get one? Well, with the rumored March 17th firmware upgrade for the full frame sensored Canon EOS 5DmkII, it depends how many pennies are in my piggy bank. I think I’d like to get my hands on both and see what works best for my needs. At the end of the day, any camera needs good glass, and quality prime lenses cost a lot of money. But if I take the time to really pre-plan my shots, I can rent three or four lenses to get me through. Therein lies the plan…
You won’t have to wait long to see Matt Smith piloting the Tardis under the watchful eye of new showrunner James Moffat. BBC America announced that the new series (season for us colonists) of Doctor Who begins on April 17th!
Are you ready for the new Who? The U.S. will finally get to see Matt Smith, the youngest Doctor ever and the 11th incarnation, as Doctor Who returns on BBC America, the network announced today. The BAFTA-winning drama will make its U.S. premiere on Saturday, April 17, not long after the U.K. broadcast.
If you’ve read this blog before, you know that I’m a huge fan of Russell T. Davies and think that his stewardship of the Dr. Who franchise has been just amazing. There’s been some debate as to how it will be with Moffat, but considering he wrote some of the most iconic episodes of the new incarnation of the series, including the brilliant Girl in the Fireplace, I can only bet that it will be a continuation of the level of excellence that we’ve become accustomed.
Last Saturday The Guardian published an article titled ‘Ten Rules for Writing Fiction’ consolidating advice from noted authors such as Elmore Leonard, Margaret Atwood, Helen Dunmore, Richard Ford, and Neil Gaiman. You can read the entire piece here. There’s some great stuff… some you might have heard before, but it’s always fantastic to hear it from such an amazing list of some of the most celebrated writers on Earth.
Being a genre guy, Neil Gaiman’s perspective really hit home and I wanted to share it with you here:
[Writing Tips from Neil Gaiman]
1 Write.
2 Put one word after another. Find the right word, put it down.
3 Finish what you’re writing. Whatever you have to do to finish it, finish it.
4 Put it aside. Read it pretending you’ve never read it before. Show it to friends whose opinion you respect and who like the kind of thing that this is.
5 Remember: when people tell you something’s wrong or doesn’t work for them, they are almost always right. When they tell you exactly what they think is wrong and how to fix it, they are almost always wrong.
6 Fix it. Remember that, sooner or later, before it ever reaches perfection, you will have to let it go and move on and start to write the next thing. Perfection is like chasing the horizon. Keep moving.
7 Laugh at your own jokes.
8 The main rule of writing is that if you do it with enough assurance and confidence, you’re allowed to do whatever you like. (That may be a rule for life as well as for writing. But it’s definitely true for writing.) So write your story as it needs to be written. Write it honestly, and tell it as best you can. I’m not sure that there are any other rules. Not ones that matter.
I particularly like Number 3 and Number 8. As writers or filmmakers it’s important to finish things. Finishing things is hard work, and there are so many people out there with half-written books or screenplays or short films that need one more edit. It’s important to push through and get it done, which is where Number 8 rings so true. Writers are extremely self-critical, but at the end of the day in order to finish something (#3) it takes confidence to make it happen. Confidence isn’t arrogance, but instead a strong belief in the project to move it to completion.
It’s great advice. Be sure to check out the rest of the article, too. [link]
I’m so honored to have participated in this month’s SF Signal Mind Meld. The subject is SciFi shows that deserve a remake. You can check out the article here at SF Signal:
It’s happened to all of us. We’re watching an action TV show or movie filled with car chases, alien attacks, secret conspiracies, running gun battles, explosions, and all types of other loud, crazy things to get our blood pumping. The plot builds, we get excited about learning more, and then it happens. Our hero’s cell phone rings. It could be the wife/husband, the girlfriend/boyfriend, sister/brother, mom/dad, or the kid wondering when he/she is going to be picked up from soccer practice. The effect is like being in a Bugatti Veyron at 240 miles per hour and hitting a mountain. The hero looks off into the distance forlorn, closing the clamshell and resting the phone against his/her head. Everything grinds to a halt. The main plot gets put on hold for some character development, but a lot of the time descends into hopeless hand wringing while the hero feels sorry for him/herself. As viewers we sit there, frustrated, wondering what happened to the gun, the hostage, the missing nuclear weapon, or even the reason why we’re watching.
Then the ultimate insult presents itself: the good cry in the bathtub/shower juxtaposed against coffee house acoustic guitar with breathy solo vocals. Wasn’t there just a terrorist somewhere doing or planning something awful? Does the hero really have time for this? Do we? What else is on TV? Oh, a show about renting apartments… sounds like it moves along quicker.
Character development is extremely important, especially in today’s television where there is always some sort of multi-season arc. Back in the day the structure was plot-plot-plot-plot and more plot. Very little time was devoted to investigating the characters. Episodes were mainly self-contained and it wasn’t that big of a deal to watch them out of order. Now we want to know more about our heroes–what motivates them and why they do what they do. But too often the plot grinds to an abrupt halt while the hero deals with his/her personal problems.
The reason for this is that the character development is not integrated into the arc of the story. It’s separate, and as a result slows down the plot because we have to look away into a whole other narrative. It may run in parallel per the structure of the series, but in my opinion it all works better when the character and plot converge as one where the character deals with his/her issues through the main plot itself. It’s almost like a two for one: you get to watch the plot unfold, get resolved, and learn more about the hero.
One action TV show that does this very well is Human Target on Fox. What appears on the surface as an 80s style action show is truly a 21st century model with the character arc and weekly plots integrated together. The whole reason that Christopher Chance does what he does is because of his past. It motivates him and his actions in each and every episode. Guerrero and Winston also have skeletons in their history that brought them all to the point where they’re working together. Each of the three characters is damaged in some way and the agency is their path to redemption. The development is done through conversations with characters within each weekly plot and relate to what is happening within the episode. We don’t have to be pulled out of the story for a good cry in the shower. Anyway, neither Chance, nor Guerrero, nor Winston are the type to shed tears, but you get my point.
Human Target is an action show, so character development isn’t the main point of the series, but the writers and producers understand this. They give us exactly what is advertised: a rollicking good time with high action, interesting characters, and a hero that’s fun to watch every week. But above all that they still work in the character moments without slowing down the action, and I thank them for that. We have a lot of shows that look at character and dig into relationships, but I’m sure glad that Human Target understands that action TV should be about action, and not good cries in the shower.
…the audience that turned out was 26 percent smaller than it did in the first week of November Sweeps.
Yes, it’s that time when networks put out their best to attract new advertising dollars, but genre programming — missing some of its November guns like “V” and “FlashForward” on ABC — is down more than 22 percent.
The reason? I can only guess that the big mid-season breaks, the ever longer hiatuses, and overall network nervousness when it comes to genre shows contribute to it all. For Pete’s sake, I had to try to remember everything that happened on LOST way last year–in essence had to re-catch myself up so I could get in to the season premier. And right now V is just a blur, too. I have a good memory, but when the networks take shows off for months at a time they will lose audiences. It’s what happened to Jericho and what will continue to happen with any serious genre TV that takes some brain power and viewer commitment.
My advice is to do much more pre-work, then let the series run. Pick them, test them, put them on the schedule and let them roll, good or bad. It’s terrible form to put up a show with a lot of hype and then pull it after two weeks or put it on the back burner until way later in the year, after everyone has forgotten about it. It’s okay to take breaks for holidays and all that, but breaking up a season by three to six months is programming suicide. What it means is more work at the front end to pick good, solid series, test market them, and only then put them on the air.
How can this be done effectively? Let’s take genre shows for an example. There’s Comic-Con in San Diego and New York, not to mention hundreds of other genre conventions around the country. A network can take a series pilot, or even a short film (not a whole episode), take it to those conventions and solicit feedback from the target audience. If the feedback isn’t good, then fix the show. If the show can’t be fixed, don’t put it on the schedule. It’s good business. It’s hard to take the pulse of the nation unless you go out on the street and do it one on one.
I don’t blame the shows themselves or the viewers for the low numbers. It’s the business model. It needs to change. It’s not 1972 anymore. It’s easier than ever to reach a target audience and get feedback. And once you get that feedback heed it–make the changes, get more feedback, market, and put it on the air. Then run the show and if you did your job well up front, the ratings will come.
I just caught the trailer for Neil Marshall’s Centurion and it looks simply fantastic! Making a good trailer is an art, and I think this one is an excellent example of a well thought out teaser for the film. The rhythm is good, the music draws you along, and the selected images show you what to expect. Enjoy… [From IGN]
I don’t know how else to phrase it. The Dow Jones, or the stock market, or Wall Street, or whatever nomenclature you prefer, does impact independent filmmaking. I think that every once and a while the shiny artistic drive to create film clouds the business reality that’s necessary to get the whole thing done. We as filmmakers get tunnel vision ad forget that at the end of the day the film business is just that–a business.
It takes money to make a film–a lot of money depending on your script. Even with new digital technologies and those uber cheap DSLRs, every movie costs something. You can only rely on the copy, credit, and food thing for a while until your friends stop taking your phone calls. Filmmakers need to eat, pay the rent, and ocaisionaly put gas in the car. So you need to get funding.
But as we watch the news as the Dow Jones flails around like a freshly caught fish it’s important to remember the connection to stock market performance and the quest for film financing. In order to make a film you need money. That may mean going to a studio, but for most indies to be indies, they are independently financed. Sure you can go for the tax incentives, but that’s only a piece of the puzzle. And in today’s economy with a lot of states out of cash, it’s not a definite. Those incentives will only cover a portion of the film. You still need equity money, and that’s where the whole stock market thing comes in.
People with money to give you (equity investors) for your film are, for lack of a better term, rich. Yes, rich people finance independent movies. I’ve never met a poor person who was an aggressive equity investor. The rich, the wealthy, the well-to-do have the means to cut a check to get your dream up on the silver screen. The more rich people that are out there, then the bigger the pool of possible equity investors for your film.
But for most who invest in film, it’s a “boutique” investment. Film financing is high risk. Many independent projects don’t make their money back. Yet investors who put money into films do it for the experience and the fun–they get to say that they made a movie. To them it’s like buying into a little piece of Hollywood. It’s good for them, the filmmaker, and the audience. Everybody wins.
The Dow Jones is an indicator of the overall performance of the stock market. The higher the Dow, the more equity money and wealth is available to independent filmmakers. Your equity partners are making money, and they may have some for you. When the Dow tanks, it’s the opposite. Money has been drained from the system, and investors go into “protected” mode, investing in sure things rather than big risks like film.
Right now with banks refusing loans to small businesses, your local bread shop or dry cleaner is hitting the equity market for funding… just as the indies do. With the Dow flopping around and more people looking into the equity cookie jar, that’s less for us filmmakers.
So it comes down to this: When the Dow Jones is soaring, it’s a good indicator of the health of the economy and personal wealth. When rich people make money, and more rich people are created, there in turn are more equity investors to help fund independent film and just about any other artistic endeavor you can dream up. Success breeds prosperity, which breeds opportunity. I hope for more prosperity in 2010 so that more indies can get made. It’s good for everyone.
World building in science fiction is a big deal. People study for years to learn how to do it well. It’s the key to capturing your audience and creating a stage where you can present your story with some semblance of continuity and believability. It all has to work and work together to transport the audience to a completely different place. There’s no doubt that you can do some crazy things, and there are many books on the shelf that fly way off the handle with worlds that will melt your brain, but yet even those present their “universe” in such a way that the reader can grasp the concepts and be immersed in the story.
World building in books is a different animal than doing the same in a television series. It’s all about cost. Text on a page is considerably less expensive compared to complex set builds, sophisticated computer graphics, and whatever other costumes and props are required. Although the techniques from the writer’s perspective may be the same, the producer of the TV series has to look at the bottom line. Flying cars are expensive. Towering spires of office buildings reaching into the clouds, capped by snow, don’t come cheap. Holographic jumpsuits that allow one to download new outfits on the fly sound very cool, but again cost money. I think you get my point.
Computer graphics can only do so much. I honestly believe that over the last ten years we have become too dependent on CGI, which is why I think Moon was so refreshing–Director Duncan Jones went old-school and used models. Physical sets with CGI in the far background as extensions work well, but often when characters are presented overtop a complete CGI set it can’t help to look like a cartoon… at least some of the time. So often today actors show up and walk onto a sound stage that’s completely painted from top to bottom in electric lime green. The lack of practicals makes acting a challenge, and the resultant extra time for the director to direct, well… that costs money, too. Directing on a green screen is hard, and the lighting has to be just right or all the keying before the CGI is inserted will fall flat.
But remember that good CGI costs money, and in some cases can cost just as much as a set build, depending on what needs to be done. It isn’t a silver bullet, but because it has become easier to do on desktop machines, you see a lot more of it.
Add this all up and you can see the monumental task that the writers and producers of SyFy’s Caprica were up against. Cable television shows do not have the same number of viewers as broadcast networks, and edgy dramas even less so. Keeping costs down is the key to success, and the producers of Caprica have done an amazing job taking these issues into account when building the world of the Graystones and the Adamas.
Caprica is filmed in Vancouver, British Columbia. Back in the 90s many cable shows and sci-fi series escaped across the border for the Canadian incentives and favorable exchange rate. There’s been a history of budget-oriented world building from many series produced in the area. Stargate SG-1 was a great example. They built into the canon the fact that the Goa’uld kept most other human settlements primitive, so they could set up a bunch of tents in the BC woods, and voila, a whole new planet. They also used a lot of physical sets (reusing components as needed) with CGI extensions, and it worked. Travels to more advance planets like the Tollan could be accomplished at a college or modern office complex. It kept the costs down, but was done so well it sold the series for over a ten year run.
Caprica is following suit with using what the area has at its disposal. One of the greatest advantages they have is the fact that modern day Vancouver looks like a futuristic city with it’s densely packed skyline of recently built towers. On tight shots not much needs to be done to sell the look of an advanced human society. Go wide and it’s just as simple to drop in some CGI that’s far enough back not to look cheesy. It’s seamless and it works extremely well because Caprica, in a way, is supposed to follow the lines of development on Earth. At the end of the day the people of the twelve colonies are humans, and it’s only logical that a human society would follow a similar developmental path. I know that can be debated, but for the purposes of the Caprica world build it’s extremely effective.
Vehicles, in my opinion, are the most problematic. The producers of Caprica handle this problem by dropping in some odd-looking European models from decades past. Since the story is set over fifty years prior to Battlestar Galactica, it does the trick in a very cool and efficient way. It saves them from having to construct or modify vehicles–something again that is very costly.
I also like how they have taken cues from The Godfather and applied a lot of familiar images when creating the Tauron underworld. Chunky suits, dark apartments, and social clubs appear familiar and grounded, but twisted just enough to be believable as from another world.
I could go on about the cool old telephones, or how Lacy’s bungalow works against the modern city, or any of the other million little familiar things presented just askew to achieve a tour-de-force in science fiction world building on TV, but I do have to do other things today. In closing, let me say that Caprica should be applauded and studied by other genre producers with regard to cost effective techniques that look anything but. Two episodes and a movie in, I can honestly say that they’ve hooked me, and I look forward to the ride.